Sorry, these are class materials.

I think “mirror” works as it reflects back to us the way of knowing that is operative. I like “operative” better that “impose”.

Rather than constructs being “containers”, we might think of them as “contouring” experience. Countouring is far more dynamic and immediate.

I would be careful with the seductive notions of the hidden dimensions behind appearance. TSK advances that appearances are themselves and point to no more founding reality. That is they do not point to a “thing” that looks that way, nor does it obscure some invisible, more real substrate.

Appearances as they manifest are merely ways of knowing and reflect the knowing that is in operation.

Thanks for you thoughts

Hayward

Reply