Sorry, these are class materials.
Sorry, these are class materials.Previous post: Self-forget-ness
Next post: writing and non-linear time
Sorry, these are class materials.Sorry, these are class materials.Previous post: Self-forget-ness
Next post: writing and non-linear time
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
Hi Michael,
thanks for your comment. I like the words you use of ‘weaving together’ the identified stories/things. The metaphor of weaving a tapestry of stories was in my mind when I was writing the post (probably also due to Tina’s poem ‘tapestry unwind’ a few months back). I guess that somehow the ‘X’-moments are not weaven into this tapestry but are lurking somewhere outside of it … does that make sense? After the phone call yesterday I feel confirmed in the sense I had that the ‘weaving together’ is partly ‘a cause and effect’ kind of structure. To me it seems like the whole ‘weaving together’ process might get different though(or stops …?) when you look at all the stories ‘passing by’ in a more meditative way, i.e. watching without getting involved … mmmmm but ‘where/what’ is ‘moment X’ then? I don’t know, that’s were my investigation stopped last time … :).
Eric.
Hi Eric, I was also noticing stories when I tried looking for something between moments. And I started telling a story about the exercise itself: the moments were like blocks of ice, or rafts, flowing on the surface of a stream of time, and underneath there was another kind of time which the exercise calls “X”. I started elaborating this story: the stream is flowing towards an ocean. Then it hit me: I’m continuing a narrative, but narratives can only weave together the things that I’ve identified. If I try to include “X” in my narratives, then it’s just another raft floating on the stream. –Michael